[ODE] Re: ODE (and mainly OPCODE) for 64bits

[Pierre Terdiman]

>Ok, so, I think I'll try to get time to make the port.
>By the way, I think I'll introduce a new typedef for that pointer-offset.
It
>will be easier in the futur to track it and identify it as a offset.

In any case, keep in mind "pointers" and plain 32-bit integers are stored at
the same place all the time. So if you put a pointer type here, parts of the
code will still manipulate it as if it was an int - and the whole thing will
start looking ugly. The "correct" solution is to use an union, but then it
gets even uglier. For the same reason I didn't bother doing this before, I
still wouldn't bother now. But maybe that's just me.

>Pierre: may I work with the ODE cvs, or is there a OPCODE cvs somewhere?

There's no OPCODE cvs, nope.

>(or, if I make patches against the ODE-opcode, will you port it to the
current
>OPCODE dev sources?)

If I get the time & motivation & permission, yeah...

- Pierre