[ODE] Re: center of mass
gcarlton at iinet.net.au
Sat Oct 29 09:37:14 MST 2005
I think this was the crux of disagreement that we came to last time, and
the main reason I didn't originally think a patch would be worth the
time to create (it may not be put into cvs). When I have some free time
(over the Christmas break?) I'll try make up a clean patch with the
change - it would at the very least allow a very detailed examination of
the pros and cons relative to the status quo.
I think that with the patch in hand I can show that it is both more
elegant, and is no worse on memory, but I'll leave that re-discussion
for the future!
Jon Watte (ODE) wrote:
> Last time, there was heated debate about GeomTransform being or not
> being. I happen to think that GeomTransform elegantly factors the need
> of doing a separate transform -- or not, and elegantly implements it
> with the transform pointer (so it saves memory, which means saving the
> So, just applying it because it's proposed isn't necessarily "right".
> / h+
> J. Perkins wrote:
>> On 10/28/05, Geoff Carlton <gcarlton at iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>> The source is available on:
>>> It contains every change and fix I've made to ode to get it working to
>>> my satisfaction for the game SkyTracks. In regards to geomtransform
>>> change, the core code is there and some (but not all) of the interface
>>> functions that I listed previously.
>> If you can find a way to pull out the important changes, I'll put them
>> into the patch manager and try to get them applied. I'm afraid that
>> "here's my code" is more than I can handle, even with all of my good
>> intentions. ;)
>> ODE mailing list
>> ODE at q12.org
More information about the ODE