[ODE] Latest Commit

[Rodrigo Hernandez]

Ok, I'll leave the decision on which framework to use to those who know 
about it, once you make your choice, let me know, and I'll integrate it.

J. Perkins wrote:

>On 10/27/05, Rodrigo Hernandez <kwizatz at aeongames.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>However, the idea that testing code would end up on the final binary
>>library, either just as extra bagage or actually affecting performance
>>keeps bothering me, can someone
>>care to explain how this will not happen?
>>    
>>
>
>Because the unit tests will be in their own library.
>
>Like Jon, I've been unit testing for a while now, and I agree with him
>on most points, though I probably wouldn't force the tests to run
>after every build. But I would feel much more comfortable if the unit
>tests, including any framework code, were built every time the library
>was updated. Otherwise there is the opportunity for the tests to drift
>out of sync with the code, breaking the build for others. If CppUnit
>were the only option I'd say go for it, but there are other
>frameworks. Even the article you referenced in your original post did
>not recommend CppUnit. Though again, I appreciate your offer to
>integrate it with the build, but I want to make sure we pick the right
>tool here.
>
>Russ has given me admin rights in the patch manager, so I will spend
>some time this weekend sorting through the patches, trying to figure
>out what has already been applied and where. Once that is done, then I
>will start looking at unit testing.
>
>Jason
>
>  
>