[ODE] Rope simulation

Jaroslav Sinecky jsinecky at tiscali.cz
Thu May 26 12:35:31 MST 2005


Of course ... silly me.

-----Original Message-----
From: ode-bounces at q12.org [mailto:ode-bounces at q12.org]On Behalf Of Gary R.
Van Sickle
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:16 AM
To: ode at q12.org
Subject: RE: [ODE] Rope simulation


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ode-bounces at q12.org [mailto:ode-bounces at q12.org] On
> Behalf Of Jaroslav Sinecky
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 1:29 AM
> To: ode at q12.org
> Subject: Re: [ODE] Rope simulation
>
> I think you could use universal joints instead of ball joints
> if you don't need to model rope "twisting". That would save
> one constraint per each joint and thus less work for LCP
> solver. (or am I wrong...?)
>

That would actually add constraints.  I don't know if that would help or
not.

--
Gary R. Van Sickle

_______________________________________________
ODE mailing list
ODE at q12.org
http://q12.org/mailman/listinfo/ode



More information about the ODE mailing list