[ODE] From unstable to trunk...

[Pablo Barbáchano]

 --- "Jon Watte (ODE)" <hplus-ode at mindcontrol.org> escribió:

> 
> Is it time to change to something like Perforce or Subversion, which 
> tracks specific related change sets? It's much easier to integrate "this 
> particular patch" with those tools.
> 

<offtopic class="myfavouritecvs">

Maybe you want to check darcs (http://www.darcs.net), but sure, subversion
is much better than CVS.

> tigris.org is a hosting site that lets you host on Subversion for free, 
> btw. (I don't know where SourceForge is at WRT Subversion project hosting)
> 

Darcs doesn't need a "special" server. just put it on the web for checkouts,
and checkin via ssh or email. no need to configure anything in the server.
</offtopic>

Cheers ;),
Pablo

> Cheers,
> 
>               / h+
> 
> 
> Adam D. Moss wrote:
> > Hi all.
> > 
> > I have the ability to check things into the trunk, and
> > I'm relatively awake lately.  We should start moving some
> > of the 'proven' patches from UNSTABLE to trunk before UNSTABLE
> > just becomes an irreconcilable fork and dumping pile.
> > 
> > I haven't been tracking UNSTABLE myself, so if someone wants
> > to point out (or much better, isolate and mail a patch to me)
> > some good candidates for merging to trunk, that would be
> > good.  I'm mainly interested in merging stuff to trunk which
> > generally improves the stability and quality of code, so I'm
> > reluctant to be moving 'feature' patches to the trunk at
> > this point unless they're well-proven.
> > 
> > ta,
> > --adam
> _______________________________________________
> ODE mailing list
> ODE at q12.org
> http://q12.org/mailman/listinfo/ode
> 



	
	
		
______________________________________________ 
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo! 
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad 
http://correo.yahoo.es