[ODE] Autotools added to UNSTABLE

Jon Watte hplus-ode at mindcontrol.org
Tue Apr 12 09:19:50 MST 2005

I use static library. Actually, I usually just drag the .cpp 
files into the executable itself, because edit-and-continue 
works better that way.


			/ h+

-----Original Message-----
From: ode-bounces at q12.org [mailto:ode-bounces at q12.org]On Behalf Of
Rodrigo Hernandez
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:48 AM
To: ode at q12.org
Subject: Re: [ODE] Autotools added to UNSTABLE

Hope everyone likes it :)

by the way, I was wondering which flavor do people use the most static 
library or shared library?
in order to implement support for Windows DLLs there is no other choise 
but to pass a definition
to the compiler "-D{something}" telling it to either link against static 
or shared, my idea is to
make the default whatever people use the most (which will require no 
define) and requiring the
define for the other option.


Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:

>Excellent Rodrigo!  I'll take a look at this as soon as I can.  For those
>who may not know much about autotools, Rodrigo has just improved the ODE
>package's cross-platformness by about a billion percent.

ODE mailing list
ODE at q12.org

More information about the ODE mailing list