[ODE] Stability of ODE in NovodeX Rocket...

John Miles jmiles at pop.net
Wed Oct 20 09:50:51 MST 2004


I can't imagine a good reason to keep StepFast around (or, frankly, Step,
for that matter), but it should probably be Russell's call.

-- jm

>
> > A lot of it is todo with the lack of material support. Increasing the
> > solver count in QuickStep might help too.
>
> Is there a solver count in QuickStep? I know that the deprecated
> StepFast() used a solver count, but there's no such argument to
> the public QuickStep() implementation.
>
> Btw: because StepFast() was a late addition, and already deprecated,
> shouldn't we actually take it out of the API? The people who use it
> can probably easily port to QuickStep or Step.
>



More information about the ODE mailing list