Managed Wrapper (was: RE: [ODE] My ODE++)

[ken]

Jon Watte wrote:
> 
> Perhaps you can elaborate? In case you lost the context, here's a summary:
> 
> - Someone was saying that a better C++ wrapper might make writing a managed ("CLR" "DOTNET" etc) API for ODE easier.
> - I replied that I had written a managed API that's richer than the current wrapper available in contrib, and I described the approach I took, including wrapping using Managed DirectX APIs to reduce impedance.
> - Someone replied that tieing the managed API to DirectX precluded other platforms from using the managed wrapper.
> - The only other platform that could conceivably use that would be "DOTGNU" running under Linux, and, honestly, it's not currently anything I'd base a production-worthy effort on, which is what my joke was about. It seems that you were trying to prove that there are production efforts using DOTGNU on Linux, but I fail to see how your links apply.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>                         / h+
> 

ack!

I too fail to see how they apply. I should know better than to type
out an email before I have my morning coffee, I completely missed the
original context. (Just for the record, there is also the
Novell/Ximian mono project http://www.go-mono.com/, but I'd bet there
are no large graphics apps using it either). Sorry for the lame reply,
and thanks for the development work on ODE!

-k