[ODE] odecpp.h

[maddocks@metservice.com]

On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 02:03  AM, Martin C. Martin wrote:

> I think having the "operator dGeomID" in dGeom is a cleaner solution,
> because it means less code to maintain (and therefore fewer chances for
> bugs), and also allows dGeoms to be used in anybody else's code that 
> takes
> a dGeomID, even if they didn't think about the C++ wrappers.  The only
> down side is that it's a little cryptic, as you pointed out.  Maybe time
> for a comment in the odecpp.h and/or the docs?


Sorry, should have read the rest of the header. What you have done is 
good. I just saw that add took a dGeomID and didn't read any further:
( I'll think before typing next time.

henry


"If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed... wait, 
never mind."