[ODE] Redistributing a C++ Wrapper for ODE

[Clay Larabie]

There's nothing wrong with the C API, it is easy to use, but it isn't
consistent with my existing C++ code.
Also, I have my own classes for Vector3, Quaternions, etc. and I wanted to
use those instead of ODE's structures and math functions, therefore I
encapsulate ODE in C++ classes, with Set and Get functions that perform the
necessary conversions.

Seems pretty straightforward, I'm sure a lot of people have done the same.

Clay

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nguyen Binh" <ngbinh@glassegg.com>
To: <ode-admin@q12.org>; "Clay Larabie" <c-larabie@rogers.com>
Cc: <ode@q12.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [ODE] Redistributing a C++ Wrapper for ODE


> Hi,
>    Why would you need to write a C++ wrapper for ODE?
>
>    I think the C (and a little C++)  API of ODE is fairly easy to use
>    enough.
>
>    What we need to do, IMHO, is REWRITTEN ODE in C++.Means we need to
>    get all idea of ODE and then design it in C++ style, then coding.
>
>    By that way we can exposed many wonderful features of C++.
>
>    For example, now it's not easy (or clear) for us to write our own
>    integrator.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Nguyen Binh
>    Software Engineer
>    Glass Egg Digital Media
>    Me Linh Point Tower, 10th Floor
>    2 Ngo Duc Ke
>    District 1, Ho Chi Minh City
>    Vietnam
>    Fax:  (84.8)823-8392
>      www.glassegg.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>