> > Well, the rationale is that it leaves us some space to 1.0 ? > We can go to 0.9 if you prefer that. > The long list of changes may warrant a higher bump in version? We could always go to 0.10, 0.11, 0.12, if additional time is required before 1.0? In an X.Y.Z version numbering scheme, a change in Z suggests to me a trivial fix, or an optimisation. Cheers, Mark