[ODE] ODE v1.0?

[Olex]

I'd like to second that as a ODE user. Many things should go as
external projects that expand ODE.

On 3/31/06, Jon Watte (ODE) <hplus-ode at mindcontrol.org> wrote:
> Alessandro La Vekkia Damiani wrote:
>
> >>While I've got folks discussing things...what do you think ODE needs
> >>before it could be considered 1.0? Code, documentation, website,
>
> > Efficient trimesh trimesh collision
>
> Given that a number of physics packages have been charging a LOT of
> money for years without efficient trimesh/trimesh collisions, I don't
> think that should gate releasing 1.0 of ODE.
>
> > stable and reliable data file format (with load and save func)
>
> I disagree that it should even be part of the core ODE API. I don't
> think it should -- it's a perfect thing to put in a supporting library
> of some sort.
>
> > plug ins and tools to generate data files
>
> Perfect for separate projects and libraries.
>
> > documentation for anything above
> > doxygen docs for interface funcs
>
> Agree with both of these.
>
> Cheers,
>
>                         / h+
> _______________________________________________
> ODE mailing list
> ODE at q12.org
> http://q12.org/mailman/listinfo/ode
>


--
Oleksandr Lozitskiy

"To be without some of the things you want is an indispensable part of
happiness." by Bertrand Russell