[ODE] Linux binaries?
Jean de Largentaye
jlargentaye at gmail.com
Thu Mar 30 13:24:49 MST 2006
I use ODE only on Linux...
Prebuilt binaries imply packaging, on Linux. There are a ton of
distribs out there. I personally favor Debian, all the rest sucks ;P
*ducks and runs away*. It's easier to let people familiar with each
distribution make the binaries plus packages for that distribution.
Furthermore, there were problems with OPCODE and x86-64, related to
improper pointer arithmetic, which prevented having binaries for those
architectures (at least on Debian).
Finally, I seem to recall some problems with ODE as a dynamic library
on Linux...
just my .02 euros.
John
On 3/30/06, J. Perkins <starkos at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the flood of emails, folks...
>
> I noticed that for 0.5 there are no prebuilt Linux binaries. I use
> Linux occasionally, but haven't done a lot of development for it yet.
> Is there an issue with the platform that makes prebuild binaries
> impractical? Is there some reason why I might *not* want to release
> Linux binaries?
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> ODE mailing list
> ODE at q12.org
> http://q12.org/mailman/listinfo/ode
>
More information about the ODE
mailing list