[ODE] New release?

[Olex]

That would be pretty awesome to have ODE on SVN. As far as I know, you can
have both SVN and CVS at the same time on SF.net, so it would be great to at
least give it a try.

On 3/15/06, J. Perkins <starkos at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/14/06, Geoff Carlton <gcarlton at iinet.net.au> wrote:
> > If there are a lack of active owners, the STABLE branch may well become
> > fallow again.  I believe its possible to make a tag/branch, where we can
> > split off UNSTABLE at a given point in time, make sure it is stable, and
> > then package that up.
>
> I do this for my own project. I think it is a pretty standard
> approach, and I think it is the right approach. I will coordinate
> things and get this done. But I don't like working with branches in
> CVS, when they are so much easier in Subversion. SO...
>
> Are there any objections to importing the UNSTABLE branch of CVS into
> Subversion? I find Subversion much easier to use, particularly when it
> comes to branching and tagging. It allows versioning of the entire
> directory structure, not just individual files. And a big one for me:
> it is accessible over HTTP, which means I can get at the repository
> from behind a firewall.
>
> The ideas is to import UNSTABLE, then turn off CVS and work from
> Subversion. I will create an branch for the next release (0.6?), and
> only accept bug fixes into the branch while I work on finishing up the
> new Visual Studio project files and release scripts. Open development
> can continue on the trunk.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> ODE mailing list
> ODE at q12.org
> http://q12.org/mailman/listinfo/ode
>



--
Oleksandr Lozitskiy

"To be without some of the things you want is an indispensable part of
happiness." by Bertrand Russell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://q12.org/pipermail/ode/attachments/20060315/7f562482/attachment.htm