[ODE] Versioning system. Was: No Rotation Joint

[Terry L. Triplett]

Depends on how the naming conventions for versioning are supposed to work
moving forward, now that the pace is picking up.  Not sure I remember seeing
this discussed since I joined the list - sorry if I'm revisiting a topic
already discussed.

What would trigger incrementing of the major/minor revision numbers and what
scheme is being followed?

Do bug fixes against the current 0.6 go into something like 0.6.1,
while 0.7implies new functionality (or some sort of target/milestone)?
 Or is
0.7 just the next release and can include fixes since the 0.6 relase and
anything else that's gone into the trunk since (barring some major change in
functionality)?

On 6/14/06, Jason Perkins <starkos at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/14/06, Hidden Asbestos <hidden.asbestos at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > So, could someone with SVN access please be kind enough to review and
> > integrate this code into the trunk?
>
> What do people think? Should this go into the trunk for 0.7?
>
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> ODE mailing list
> ODE at q12.org
> http://q12.org/mailman/listinfo/ode
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://q12.org/pipermail/ode/attachments/20060614/c179bb15/attachment.htm