[ODE] branches, release, etc
Terry L. Triplett
c0d3g33k at gmail.com
Tue Apr 4 11:54:53 MST 2006
Sorry if that was confusing. Was trying to provide some feedback from
downstream regarding ODE variants in general - wasn't talking specifics.
The memory of the ODE 0.5 build system is still recent - am still getting
familiar with (and loving) the very welcome shift to autotools. I'm
grateful.
On 4/4/06, Rodrigo Hernandez <kwizatz at aeongames.com> wrote:
>
> Terry L. Triplett wrote:
>
> >
> > I would concur. As a maintainer of .NET ODE bindings, the fewer
> > possible permutations of features in the library the better. If a
> > feature is stable and generally used by everyone anyway, it should be
> > active by default.
>
> It IS active by default, the only misleading bit was the fact that the
> help messages printed by configure --help listed --with-opcode as an
> option to add OPCODE instead of --without-opcode as an option to exclude
> it, and it has been fixed.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://q12.org/pipermail/ode/attachments/20060404/16a840e3/attachment.htm
More information about the ODE
mailing list