Fwd: [ODE] From unstable to trunk...

[J. Perkins]

Again, I hit "reply" instead of "reply all"

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: J. Perkins <starkos at gmail.com>
Date: Jul 1, 2005 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: [ODE] From unstable to trunk...
To: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g.r.vansickle at worldnet.att.net>


On 7/1/05, Gary R. Van Sickle <g.r.vansickle at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> Agreed and agreed, if "a lot more love" == "more active maintainership".
> With an active maintainer(s), the rest of the stuff tends to sort itself
> out, mainly because the maintainers just decide what they want to do and do
> it.  I've never seen it work the other way around, e.g. suddenly a dozen
> maintainers pop up because a project switched from cvs to subversion.

Also agree, BUT assuming that one or more active maintainers don't
appear out of the woodwork, switching to a system that makes it easier
to submit, find, and apply patches would help development.

But this has been all talk and no action. Does anyone object to moving
to Subversion? Does anyone object to using branches to track patches?
If not, I will research tigris this weekend and try to scope the move.

Jason