[ODE] Inverse Dynamics in ODE -- does it take morecomputationthanjust pure forward dynamics?

[gl]

Or how about requiring both values to be set in the same call - then you can 
assert right there and then if they're invalid (and nothing 'silent' needs 
to be doc'ed).
--
gl

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jon Watte" <hplus-ode at mindcontrol.org>
To: "Joe Ante" <joe at otee.dk>; "ODE" <ode at q12.org>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 1:45 AM
Subject: RE: [ODE] Inverse Dynamics in ODE -- does it take 
morecomputationthanjust pure forward dynamics?


>
>> I totally agree that this is a pain.
>> We could also simply make sure that the low limit is always smaller
>> than the high limit.
>
> In that case, we should document that that's so, too. I hate code
> that silently hides bugs. ;-) Anyway, I like that suggestion -- 
> anyone willing to apply to the CVS source?
>
> Cheers,
>
> / h+
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ODE mailing list
> ODE at q12.org
> http://q12.org/mailman/listinfo/ode
>