[ODE] XODE - should angles be in degrees or radians?

[Shaul Kedem]

Will,
 No problem, been meaning to help on this XML thing
from the start. About the schema - I hope I'll get
around to it on saturday (so be around at about
18:00GMT).

 Looking at the latest version of the file, you say:
"Joint objects must define a 'type' attribute which
can have one of several values and determines the
underlying ODE joint which is used.  Listed below are
those values."

 Didn't we diceded to use elements for joints, not
'type' attributes?

Best,
Shaul

 
--- William Denniss <lists at omegadelta.net> wrote:
> new version up: http://tankammo.com/xode/xode.txt 
> radians only.
> 
> Does anyone have any other issues with the spec as
> it stands now?
> 
> Shaul, thank you for your work on the Schema, how is
> that coming along?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Will.
> 
> On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 09:30, Megan Fox wrote:
> > *slaps forehead*
> > 
> > You're right, I read that complete wrong.
> > 
> > 
> > I would still vote radians.
> > 
> > 
> > (the feeling-slow today)
> > -Megan Fox
> >  
> > > I think you're confusing radians with
> quaternions. <g>
> > > 
> > > Radians just treat a circle's circumference as a
> series of 2*pi 
> > > segments of
> > > length equal to the radius (if c=pi*d, then
> c=2*pi*r).  All of 
> > > the C runtime
> > > trig functions expect radians.
> > > 
> > > Quaternions are the "other" usual  way to
> represent 3D rotations, besides
> > > Euler angles.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > ODE mailing list
> > ODE at q12.org
> > http://q12.org/mailman/listinfo/ode
> -- 
> William Denniss - will@ http://tanksoftware.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ODE mailing list
> ODE at q12.org
> http://q12.org/mailman/listinfo/ode


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com