[ODE] Geomgroups vs composite
Adam D. Moss
aspirin at ntlworld.com
Mon Feb 10 06:46:02 2003
skjold@cistron.nl wrote:
> In short: I expected indeed for collisions and dynamics to be strictly separate things, but if that is so then there would be no way to know for ODE which geoms belonged to a single composite (right?)
I expected geoms to know about their bodies (they are moved
in lockstep for convenience, for one reason), but didn't really
expect bodies to know about their geoms too. However, a body keeps
a pointer to its first (just its first -- why?) attached geom. I
wish it was clearer to me why.
--
Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ adam@gimp.org http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3
busting makes me feel good
'"Wankbadger" failed to reach MPs. "Wank-badger" succeeded.'