[ODE] C++ wrappers

henry.maddocks@met.co.nz henry.maddocks at met.co.nz
Wed Apr 10 21:38:01 2002


Same here. I've been doing the same work for my game. No point in re 
inventing the wheel


On Thursday, April 11, 2002, at 11:08  AM, Russ Smith wrote:

> no ... i simply didn't bother much with the existing C++ wrappers.
> so now they're out of date. i didn't consider that the C++ interface
> added much genuinely useful functionality ... although proper
> polymorphism for joint and geom types would be useful. yes, i would
> definitely be interested in your C++ wrappers when they are done.
>
>
"Two is not equal to three, even for large values of two"